Posts

FACT CHECKERS DO NOT POSSESS SUPERIOR INFORMATION OR FAULTLESS FACTS NOR ARE THEY IN POSSESSION OF THE ABSOLUTE TRUTHS

Image
  FACT CHECKERS DO NOT POSSESS SUPERIOR INFORMATION OR FAULTLESS FACTS NOR ARE THEY IN POSSESSION OF THE ABSOLUTE TRUTHS Topic: Debate between former Pfizer VP and Senior Scientist Michael (Mike) Yeadon versus Facebook Fact checkers and Pfizer Main point: “... that itself was evidence what going on...New World Order run by technocrats and medical tyranny... a new communist form of system...” 52 Comments: *** Chris S, 6 May 2021 at 11:18 AM: We know the credentials of Dr. Michael Yeadon, among other things, Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer and Respiratory Expert at Pfizer for 16 years. So what are the credentials of the fact checkers? Who are they? Who pays them? Guest # 16193246235, 25 Apr 2021 at 12:23 PM: Fact Checkers do not lie, but then again so many other so-called truth advocates, they do wear the Brown Paper Bag Of Truth over their heads to validate the authenticity of their findings. Guest # 162060608438, 10 May 2021 at 8:25
Post a Comment
Read more

NEW RULE FOR ONLINE (PUBLIC) DEBATE THAT IMPLEMENTS THE COMMANDMENT ON NOT TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS BUT TO BE HONEST AND GENUINE

  NEW RULE FOR ONLINE (PUBLIC) DEBATE THAT IMPLEMENTS THE COMMANDMENT ON NOT TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS BUT TO BE HONEST AND GENUINE Arnulfo Laniba: To Patrick and all: Patrick Deuna Parreño, bro, if we make a good rule in this discussion, one should be this: Don’t generalize because if you do, then, you are labeling the whole person, that is, everything of the person while in truth, the observation or label is only applicable to a specific one area not all areas, like the common Filipino accusation (expression) "Bobo ka" (You are foolish) when in reality he is not bobo in so many other areas, but only in that one area, so what we have been doing all the way, in our practice of general labeling is this: we have been lying, not telling the truth, not being honest and moreover, not considerate and loving, every time we generalize and label the person "bobo ka", oh, would it be much better to attack or address only the point or issue, and not the pe
Post a Comment
Read more